Daniel

= = = toc Title of assignment and task: = Author: Daniel Meyer Institution: False Bay FET College

= Context of your assignment, e.g. discipline, students, level of studies = Discipline: Mechanical Engineering Students background: Students come from a wide variety/ range of background Gender: Male and female Language: Afrikaans, English and French Age: 20 - 26 years Level of study: 1st Year @ Tertiary level : Level 5

= Learning Objectives: = Demonstrate:
 * the ability to interact and understand the terms and conditions of the Health and Occupational safety Act 85 of 1993
 * the ability to investigate and have the knowledge to identify workshop safety, hazardous conditions and unsafe acts.
 * the ability to write an investigative report and hone oral presentation skills.
 * Understand and use basic terms and terminology of the technical language (language used in the engineering sphere).

**Assigment Goal** (highest expectations):
To hone the students report writing, investigating and presentation skills. To build confidence and awareness in a working environment for when the student will start with his / her WIL. Also make the student alert to achieve SMART (**S**pecific, **M**easurable, **A**chievable, **R**elevant and **T**ime-bound)objectives.

Formative tasks leading up to summative task
The student will not be expected to go in cold and just go and conduct the investigation. The student will be covertly prepare, and this preparation will be in the form of pre-assignment / assessment preparation. the OHS Act will be discussed in an informal and formal way in the class. A progress test will be administered in the class room and it will be peer marked. The students will be given the opportunity to interact with a OHS legal Practictioner in a safe environment. The students will also interact with Health and Safety inspectors from the Department of Labour as well as safety representatives of various engineering workshops.

On completion of all the abovementioned formative tasks time will be allowed for feed back sessions in the class room where an vague and ambiguity will be addressed and clear for the student.

Full task description in cluding title of assignment and formative tasks leading up to summative task
Every year many man hours are lost because of industrial accidents at an enormous expense. As a member of the safety commoittee in the mechanical workshop, explain how you will improve safety standards in your workshop. Write an extensive comprehensive report of not less than a 1500 words on how to do improve safety standards. Your report must include the following: = Marking grid/rubric = = = = = Student: ..................................... Student Number: ...................................... Group: ............................. = = = =
 * Legislation that governs workshop safety
 * Basic philosophy of loss control
 * Housekeeping
 * Fire prevention
 * Personal protective clothing
 * Indaustrial health and welfare
 * Safety organisation
 * Principles of supervision
 * Marking Rubric for Research Report **
 * Criteria ||  Self  ||  Peer  ||  Consensus  ||  Lecturer  ||
 * 1 || Cover Page ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 2 || Index and Content ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 3 || Research and collection of Information ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 4 || Processing and use of information ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 5 || Final Product Quality ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 6 || Technical Quality ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * 7 || Bibliography ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * TOTAL ||   ||   ||   ||   ||

= = Resources are acknowledged || Four relevant resources of a multi-media nature used. Resources are referred to in an appropriate way || Three relevant resources of a multi-media nature used. Reference are made to resources in text || Two resources other than text book used. Resources have slight reference to topic. Resources not mentioned in text. || Evidence of insight into relationship between subject knowledge and real world practice. Fully complied with brief and instructions || Good relevant and well researched presentation. Demonstrates very good insight. Fully complied with brief and instructions || Relevant and well researched presentation. Demonstrates good insight. Fully complied with brief and instructions || Relevant content shows little insight Area of research covered. Just complied to brief and instructions Very little effort made || Proof of pride and hard work. Bound, Index, glossary, references and bibliography || Excellent presentation, made use of available sources and technology. Proof of pride and hard work. Bound, Index, glossary, references and bibliography || Presentation acceptable made use of some sources and technology. 3 of the following Bound, Index, glossary, references and bibliography || Presentation partial acceptable 2 of the following Bound, Index, glossary, references and bibliography || Title, Author, Publisher, web address, and date || Detailed list of at least Four reference sources. Title, Publisher, web address, and date || Detailed list of at least three reference sources. Title, Publisher, web address, and date || List of at least Two reference sources with at least two of the specifications below Title, Publisher, web address, and date || = =
 * Criteria || 4 Outstanding || 3. Highly Competent || 2.Satisfactory || 1. Partial ||
 * Cover Page || The following was done extremely neatly: Name Register Class Year Appropriate illustration Appropriate Title || The 5 following was done neatly: Name Register Class Year Appropriate illustration Appropriate Title || The 4 following was done neatly: Name Register Class Year Appropriate illustration Appropriate Title || The 3 following was done neatly: Name Register Class Year Appropriate illustration Appropriate Title ||
 * Index and Content || Extremely neatly completed with: All headings Sub-headings Page numbers Page numbers on index match content || Very neat complete with: All headings Sub-headings Page numbers Page numbers on index match content || Neat complete with: All headings Sub-headings Page numbers Page numbers on index match content || Neat complete with 3 of the following: All headings Sub-headings Page numbers Page numbers on index match content ||
 * Research and collection of Information || Wide variety of relevant multimedia resources used.
 * Processing and use of information || Extremely logic way in which student, planned, processed, interpret and presented the information. || Student processed, interpret and presented the information in a logic way || Student processed, interpret and presented the information in a satisfactorily way || No planning and processing of information. Content copied. Cut and paste from resources ||
 * Final Product Quality || Outstanding presentation of extremely high quality, In depth presentation reminiscent of real world practice.
 * Technical Quality || Outstanding and impressive final product, made full use of available sources and technology.
 * Bibliography || Detailed list of at least Five reference sources.

= = = = = =
 * COMPETENCE LEVEL INDICATORS ****: **
 * **Rating Code ** ||  **Rating **  ||  **Percentage Scored **  ||
 * 4 || Outstanding || 80 – 100% ||
 * 3 || Highly Competent || 70 – 79% ||
 * 2 || Satisfactory || 50 – 69% ||
 * 1 || Partial || 0 – 49% ||

= =

= = = = = Rationale for design based on theoretical educational literature = = = =Peer review= Name of peer reviewer: Comments:

=Changes implemented after peer review=