adiel

= = = toc Title of assignment and task: = Author: Institution:
 * Role players and Stakeholders in the Construction Industry **

= Context of your assignment, e.g. discipline, students, level of studies = The teaching event took place at a semi-urban FET College which presides under the Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET). This institution has a diverse student population of 820 students and is situated in the Helderberg region. At this particular college various vocational and training programmes are offered on a fulltime and part time basis. This assignment is prepared for the Level 5 Civil and Building Construction fulltime students. The class consist of 24 male and 16 female students with the average age ranging from 19 -30 years old,. Most of the students come from a disadvantage community with English as a second language. This assignment will enabled and prepared the teacher/ lecturer to be a more effective practitioner in a learner-centred learning and teaching environment. Constructive feedback will be given to the students when the results are made available. The feedback will enable the learner to reflect on his/ her shortcomings and improve on it. The feedback will also enable the lecturer to reflect whether his teaching, lesson planning and assessment strategies / tools were effective for teaching and learning in higher education

= Full task description including title of assignment and formative tasks leading up to summative task = As Level 5 Building and Construction students, you are expected to do the following:


 * research on various stakeholders and role players within the construction industry.
 * have interviews with at least 6 role players./ stakeholders in the construction industry.
 * sites managers must give proof that you were at that particular site.
 * person interviewed must confirm the meeting.

= Marking grid/rubric = Your assignment should not be more than 6 or less than 4 typed pages excluding your cover and bibliography page.

Assessment rubric Cover page || The following were indicated: Name, Level, Year, Title, college name, programme name, Learning area. || Four of the following were indicated: Name, Level, Year, Title, college name, programme name, Learning area. || Three of the following were indicated: Name, Level, Year, Title, college name, programme name, || Two of the following were indicated: Name, Level, Year, Title, college name, || Only the following were indicated: Name, Level, || Content page || Very neat presentation All sections and sub-sections are numbered. || Neatly done & most sections and sub-sections are numbered. || Neatly done with all sections and page’s numbered. || Try all sections and page numbers. || Sections only || Research || Information is gathered from **multiple** electronic and non-electronic sources**, cited** **properly** and data taken in a **care full** manner. || Information is gathered from **multiple** electronic and non-electronic sources. || Information is gathered from **limited** electronic and non-electronic sources. || Information is gathered from electronic and non-electronic sources only || Information/ data not taken carefully or in a reliable manner. || Site Visits || Authentic evidence of site visits, interviews & inter-action with different role players or observation of a site meeting. || Authentic evidence of site visits, interviews & inter-action with different role players. || Authentic evidence of site visits and interviews || Authentic evidence of site visit only. || No authentic evidence. || Bibliography || Complete list with at least **four** sources used: Title of source Writer Publisher and date of publication || Complete list with at least **three** sources used: Title of source Writer Publisher and date of publication || Complete list with at least **three** sources used with **two** specifications: Title of source Writer Publisher and date of publication || Complete list with at least **two** sources used with **two** specifications: Title of source Writer Publisher and date of publication || Complete list with at least **two** sources used with **one** specifications: Title of source Writer Publisher and date of publication ||
 * || **5** **80-100%** **Outstanding** || **4** **70-79%** **Highly Competent** || **3** **50-69%** **Competent** || **2** **40-49%** **Not Yet Competent** || **1** **0-39%** **Not Yet Achieved** ||
 * TOTAL:25 |||||||||| ** Student name: ** ||
 * **Moderators name:** ||
 * **Lecturer:** ||

= Rationale for design based on theoretical educational literature = = = =Peer review= Name of peer reviewer: Hilton Arries Comments: The name of the assesment is mentioned.
 * Face Validity** : You need to state the name of the author(which is you ... I suppose) as well as the institution where you from. Maybe it was just the slip of the mind.

The assignment seems to be pitched at the approriate level, which is level 5 (reseach, interviews). Students are actively busy gathering information from different stakeholder and they get a feel of how it work in real life. My second question is : Is it intellectually demanding? Could you maybe build in comparisons for eg comparisons between the different role of the different stakeholders? How long do the students get to complete this assignment? Please build in a due date so that all students know how long they have. Try spreading it over a couple of weeks. There is no mention of formative assessment, so build it in somewhere. Or at least describe it. The grid is fine I think. Good luck with the rest of the assignment. =Changes implemented after peer review=
 * Authenticity** : This assessment is very authentic. This assesment mirrors a real world scenario. Students go to an actual construction site to do research on the roles of the different stakeholders. My question here is about the logistics of the visit(s) : Since it is a class of 40 students, are they all going to 1 site, or different sites. Is it an individual or a group assignment? It is not stated clearly in the assignment. Maybe you need to highlight this more in your instructions.